Skip Navigation

Posts
24
Comments
129
Joined
2 yr. ago

[He/Him, Nosist, Touch typist, Enthusiast, Superuser impostorist, keen-eyed humorist, endeavourOS shillist, kotlin useist, wonderful bastard, professinal pedant miser]Stuped person says stuped things, people boom

I have trouble with using tone in my words but not interpreting tone from others' words. Weird, isn't it?

Formerly on kbin.social and dbzer0

  • it will matter when it's gone...

  • If you redirect it all, it's not a tiny portion.

  • The argument is that ICE can always find some rich BlackRock-esque real estate holder that doesn't give af to host the camp instead if the asker terminates the lease, thus from a utilitarian perspective it's probably more useful to hold the lease and use the money to lobby against ICE.

  • I'll never understand people who apply an extra layer of bold to headings

  • Isn't that what the Ethicist column always has been? Philosophy has even historically been a bourgeois subject. (I don't think people usually put Marxism in philosophy classes.)

    Also, I don't think the response is providing cover. It encourages the question-asker to use this rental income for lobbying against ICE.

  • Assuming you mean the filibuster: They need 41, actually, and there are some things you can't filibuster like providing for congressional disapproval and nominations require 51 instead of 50. See https://www.senate.gov/legislative/cloture/119.htm for every time someone decided they might have a chance of breaking filibuster. The only acts that went through are the Laken Riley Act—the first ever—the HALT Fentanyl Act, and the GENIUS Act—which allows the Fed and States to regulate stable crypto—while the only acts that have been passed by senate are the Laken Riley Act and the TAKE IT DOWN Act which counters deepfakes. While the Laken Riley Act should've been filibustered IMO, I don't think any of the others that passed/did not meet filibuster should be stalled just for politics reasons.

  • (Note that these paragraphs all follow each other without anything between them, though the breaks in the vertical quote bar on the left may imply otherwise.)

  • There's conspiracy theories—based on Trump's expression after walking out of his first private meeting with Putin—that Russia has blackmail

  • "he" being Zelenskyy, not Putin

  • What's normal?

  • The ridiculous justification, "absolutely CRAZY!", Trump suggested "something has happened" to Putin to make him kill a lot of people, etc.

  • the mere existence of the incident, "suspect" animal abuse, lack of CCTV, "The spokesman added that there was no evidence suggesting previous attempts of anyone in the area using glue to trap or mistreat birds."

  • I know, my point is there's still a level of cruelty that everyone tolerates. Yet reduction is always better. Punishing such pigeon-gluers is reduction. Being vegetarian is reduction. Being vegan is reduction. That does not mean being any of these is being hypocritical.

  • Everyone has their limit to the ratio between tolerance and group convenience. Even vegans must also tolerate plant cruelty, for one. It's not an "on-or-off" switch.

  • time to get annoyed about somebody’s addiction to idioms!

  • when were we afraid of it besides being afraid of it for being polygraph 2.0

  • wait what did you mean by "We were afraid of mind reading tech when we should have been afraid of polygraph 2.0" then

  • what's polygraph 2.0